The Age printed out a list last Friday the 12 of Oct
of who the movers and shakers are inthe Australian
film industry.
It went into great detail about how they judged
this, except for where they got the orginial 400
names from.
The very first thing they said was that it was based
on films released from Jan 2010 to Oct 2012.
So it floored me when the very first comment about the
list was some idiot who said that Hugh Weaving should
be on the list as the matrix films did so well!!
Not only that but the next two people who commented
also agreed with the first comment.
When I read these articles the very first thing I do
is try to find out what criteria they are judging
the list on. Don't other people do the same? or are
these the people who try to put things together without
reading the instructions???
No comments:
Post a Comment